The theory of Jean Watson is based on the author’s individual observations of the process of caring as well as on her generalizations of the existing experience. The influencing factors that have pushed Watson to propose this theory were the desire to give a new meaning to the nursing profession and characterize its system of values, ethics, and mission in society (Lachman, 2012). In addition, the theorist sought to draw attention to the significance of nursing care in the healthcare system and separate it into an independent discipline.
Watson argues that the current stage of nursing science development should be regarded as a platform for the evolvement of nursing care, and it is the right time not to limit it to specific industries but rather include other branches of science such as philosophy, ecology, education, humanities, and so on in nursing.
Regarding the author’s worldview, she regards nursing care as a unique art of healing that complements the main therapeutic actions. In particular, the values of nursing care, as well as the expertise and skills directed at a person requiring help along with his or her internal processes, are most effectively combined with traditional drug therapy (Lachman, 2012). In addition, focusing on the values and mission of nursing staff, the theorist balances the curative focus of care. From the point of view of her approach, nursing encompasses disciplinary, scientific, and professional practice.
Jean Watson’s theory belongs to the group of middle-range concepts, which view patient and specialist’s interaction with the individual as the most crucial element of care. The essence of the theory centers around an understanding that care providers should be comprehensive and holistic, which means that nurses should ensure that an individual could heal on the levels of body, mind, and spirit. Experts in the field emphasize that this approach to care provision compiles art and science (Pajnkihar, McKenna, Stiglic, & Vrbnjak, 2017). One of the critical assumptions lies in the fact that this theory gives latitude to the changing environment and provides a platform for the alterations in the nursing practice.
On-time delivery!
Get your 100% customized paperdone in as little as 1 hour
In general, the concept entails four essential elements, which are person, health, setting, and care. The other critical elements are transpersonal caring relationships and an exhibition of love and hope for the patient (Pajnkihar et al., 2017). According to the author, the process of care will be beneficial for the patient when the nurse comprehends the spiritual and personal efforts she or he has to contribute when furnishing care.
Apart from that, it is necessary to dwell upon the seven principles that form the theory. First, caring can become efficient only in cases when it has an interpersonal character. Second, care implies addressing patient needs through creative aspects (Pajnkihar et al., 2017). Third, care should not delineate a patient’s well-being from personal or family growth. Fourth, care should stimulate a patient’s visions of the future. Fifth, an effective healthcare setting should provide individuals with an opportunity to make independent health-related choices. The sixth and seventh principles imply that caring should be a complementary measure to the main course of treatment and that nurses should hold the practice of caring focal to all their actions.
Notably, the theory has both supporters and those who oppose this approach to nursing care. The particular strengths of this concept are that it puts patients in the family, community, and cultural environment. In addition, it views an individual as the heart of care rather than the technology. Nevertheless, the weaknesses of Watson’s theory are linked to an insignificant amount of attention attributed to the biophysical needs of patients while concentrating on their psychological demands (Ozan, Okumus, & Lash, 2015).
Moreover, the theory should be examined further to be applied to practice effectively. In addition, the possibility of exhibiting the relations propagated by the theory is not high enough, given the current conditions in the healthcare industry. Watson’s theory presupposes the manifestation of compassion and love in the care of patients; however, it is easier for the personnel to perform manipulations aimed at providing care for the patient rather than to show empathy and